WTF • Fun • Fact    ( /dʌb(ə)lˌju/  /ti/   /ef/ • /fʌn/ • /fækt/ )

     1. noun  A random, interesting, and overall fun fact that makes you scratch your head and think what the...

WTF Fun Fact 13742 – Humming While Holding Your Nose

Ever tried humming while holding your nose? Spoiler alert: it doesn’t work, and here’s why.

The Mechanics of Humming While Holding Your Nose

Humming involves sound produced by vocal fold vibrations in your throat. Normally, when you hum, the sound exits through your nose. Yes, your nose is more than just a place to hang glasses or catch a cold; it’s a vital part of your vocal instrument.

When you hum, your mouth stays closed, so the only exit route for the air is through your nasal passages. This airflow through the nose helps to amplify and modify the sound, creating that familiar humming tone.

What Happens When Try Humming While Holding Your Nose

So, what goes down when you clamp shut your nostrils? Simply put, you block the only air escape route. When your nose is pinched shut, the air that vibrates in your vocal cords can’t escape your body easily. This disruption stops the sound from developing into a hum.

Trying to hum with your nose closed might make you feel a bit silly as you realize no sound comes out. Instead, you might just hear a muffled, nasal sound or nothing at all. It turns out that your body can’t outsmart the basics of sound physics, no matter how hard you try.

A Dive into the Science of Sound

Humming is a demonstration of sound waves being carried through air. When these waves have a clear path to travel, you hear the hum loud and clear. Block that path, and the sound waves get stifled. This is basic physics in action, showing how sound transmission needs a medium (like air) to travel effectively.

When you hold your nose and attempt to hum, you’re essentially trapping the sound waves in your head. Since they can’t escape or be properly projected, the humming just doesn’t happen.

Fun Experiments and Party Tricks

Next time you’re at a party and run out of small talk, why not pull out the “try to hum with your nose pinched” challenge? It’s a fun, quirky trick that can break the ice and spark a conversation about the weird and wonderful ways our bodies work.

Humming with your nose pinched is one of those things that sounds like it might be possible until you actually try it. It’s a neat demonstration of how interconnected our bodily functions are—even something as simple as humming involves multiple parts of our respiratory and vocal systems.

— WTF fun facts

Source: “WHY IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO HUM WHEN HOLDING YOUR NOSE” — Grunge

WTF Fun Fact 13741 – It’s Official: Tacos are Sandwiches

An Indiana judge has recently decreed that tacos are sandwiches. And so are burritos. Well, at least they’re “Mexican-style sandwiches.”

This quirky ruling has effectively seasoned the path for a new culinary venture in Fort Wayne, Indiana, sparking both chuckles and relief in the local food scene.

The Case That Stirred the Pot

The story begins with Martin Quintana, a 53-year-old restaurateur eager to open his second location of The Famous Taco. Positioned about 120 miles northeast of Indianapolis, Fort Wayne seemed ripe for a new eatery. However, Quintana’s journey took a detour into the legal world due to a rather specific zoning issue.

His property, slated for development, was restricted by a prior agreement to house only a “sandwich bar-style restaurant” specializing in “made-to-order” or “subway-style” sandwiches. When Quintana proposed his taco and burrito-focused menu, the nearby Covington Creek Association raised eyebrows, suggesting the concept didn’t sandwich into the existing terms.

A Tasty Verdict that Tacos are Sandwiches

Undeterred, Quintana took his case to the Fort Wayne Plan Commission in December 2022, seeking an amendment to explicitly include his Mexican-style offerings under the umbrella of permissible business models. The Plan Commission declined, pushing Quintana to challenge the decision in court.

Enter Judge Craig Bobay of Allen Superior Court, who faced the task of untangling this culinary conundrum. In a decision that might make legal and gastronomic history, Judge Bobay ruled that the Plan Commission was correct in denying the amendment—not because Quintana’s proposal was out of line, but because it was unnecessary. The judge found that tacos and burritos, in their essence, could be considered sandwiches. This interpretation opened the door (or perhaps the serving window) for The Famous Taco to proceed under the original agreement.

A Ruling with Relish

This verdict brings more than just another dining option to Fort Wayne; it highlights the often humorous intersection of law and everyday life. Judge Bobay’s ruling cuts through formalities to embrace a broader, more inclusive definition of what we can serve under a “sandwich bar-style” label.

The decision has been a win not just for Quintana, who can now expand his taco empire, but also for lovers of Mexican cuisine who might appreciate the judicial nod to the versatility of their favorite dishes. It seems that in Indiana, at least, the spirit of the law can accommodate a generous helping of culinary creativity.

What’s Next Now that Tacos are Sandwiches?

With legal hurdles cleared, Quintana is set to spice up Fort Wayne’s food scene. The new location of The Famous Taco promises a menu that blends traditional Mexican flavors with the convenience of a sandwich bar setup. Residents and visitors can look forward to crafting their Mexican-style “sandwiches” with a variety of fresh, made-to-order ingredients.

This case may also set a precedent for how we categorize food businesses, not just in Indiana but potentially elsewhere. It serves as a reminder that sometimes, innovation in business can come down to how broadly one interprets a term—or in this case, a menu item.

— WTF fun facts

Source: “Indiana judge opens door for new eatery, finding `tacos and burritos are Mexican-style sandwiches’” — AP News

WTF Fun Fact 13740 – The Vatican Regulates the Divine

The Vatican introduced a new set of guidelines aimed at scrutinizing claims of supernatural phenomena more rigorously. From weeping statues to miraculous healings, the Catholic Church is setting the bar high for what passes as a divine occurrence.

The Vatican’s Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, responsible for promoting and safeguarding doctrine, has crafted these rules. They replace the older guidelines from 1978, marking a significant update in how the Church handles these mysterious claims.

A Call for Rigor and Rationality at the Vatican

At a media briefing last Friday, the Vatican made its stance clear: supernatural claims must undergo a thorough investigation to prevent fraud and exploitation. The Church aims to protect its credibility and unity, steering clear of scandals that could tarnish its image.

In an era where viral news can spread falsehoods in an instant, the guidelines stress the importance of careful validation. Reports of supernatural events have surged, propelled by the rapid spread of information online. The new protocol includes issuing a “nihil obstat,” meaning “no obstacle,” for unverified but harmless claims, allowing worship without formal recognition of the supernatural.

The Vatican’s Verdicts

Under the updated rules, bishops can make one of six decisions regarding supernatural claims. These range from outright rejection to prohibiting the worship associated with certain phenomena. To ensure consistency, bishops must seek approval from the Vatican before going public with any supernatural endorsements, with the Pope stepping in for exceptional cases.

This rigorous approach is not about stifling faith but about safeguarding it from the distortions of modern myth-making. The Vatican recognizes the powerful draw of pilgrimage sites, like Lourdes in France and Fatima in Portugal, where millions visit annually, drawn by tales of Marian apparitions and miracles recognized by the Church decades ago.

The Challenge of Modern Miracles

Not all supernatural claims make the cut. Take the 2016 incident in Italy, where a woman claimed regular visions of Jesus and Mary. It took eight years for the Church to investigate and dismiss the claims, which included contentious messages on social issues like same-sex marriage and abortion. This case underscores the challenges the Church faces in distinguishing genuine spiritual phenomena from well-crafted hoaxes.

The new guidelines aim to streamline this process, ensuring that any claim of a heavenly apparition or miraculous event receives the scrutiny it deserves before being accepted or rejected.

— WTF fun facts

Source: “Vatican tightens rules on supernatural phenomena” — BBC News

WTF Fun Fact 13739 – Course des Cafés

In March 2024, over 200 waiters and waitresses took part in the “Course des Cafés,” a peculiar race that tests the speed and poise of Paris’s finest servers. This event, a revival of a century-old tradition, unfolded over a 1.2-mile loop around City Hall.

They were clad in crisp white shirts, black trousers, and neatly tied aprons. The participants balanced a croissant, a full water glass, and an empty coffee cup on their trays. Their challenge? They had to speed-walk to the finish without running, spilling anything, or using both hands on the tray.

Balance, Speed, and the Course des Cafés

The objective of the race was clear: cross the finish line as quickly as possible while keeping the tray’s contents intact. Judges were strict, docking points for any spillage or mishandling of the tray. Despite the constraints, most competitors completed the course in under 20 minutes. The fastest times recorded were just over 13 minutes.

The winners were Samy Lamrous and Pauline Van Wymeersch. They claimed medals, a night in a luxury hotel, and tickets to the upcoming Olympic opening ceremony. Van Wymeersch, with 18 years in the service industry, expressed her deep connection to the profession despite the sacrifices it entails.

A Tribute to Parisian Café Culture

The “Course des Cafés” isn’t just about the spectacle. It’s a celebration of the deep-rooted café culture in Paris, where the modern restaurant concept originated. According to Maryann Tebben, a French food culture expert, this race underscores the pride that French servers take in their craft. Many spend decades perfecting their skills at the same establishments, embodying a tradition of excellence in service.

The café waiter has been a fixture in Paris since the 17th century. This race highlights their enduring role in the city’s vibrant social scene. The original race dates back to 1914. It was similarly celebrated, with participants showcasing their agility and finesse to the cheers of onlookers.

Revival of a Tradition in a Modern Metropolis

This year’s race comes at a pivotal time, as Paris prepares to host the “greenest” Olympic Games in history. The return of the “Course des Cafés” aligns with broader environmental goals, including initiatives to reduce plastic waste in the city. Eau de Paris, the event’s sponsor, has invested in sustainable practices, providing all race materials and promoting the use of tap water over single-use plastic bottles.

The race’s revival, after a 13-year hiatus due to budget constraints, is more than just a nod to the past. It’s a strategic move to rejuvenate Paris’s café spirit and showcase French innovation and hospitality ahead of the global spotlight the Olympics will bring.

— WTF fun facts

Source

WTF Fun Fact 13738 – McCartney & Lennon’s “Primrose Hill”

Last week, a new song titled “Primrose Hill” hit the music scene, causing quite a stir. It wasn’t just any release; this song came from James McCartney and Sean Ono Lennon. That’s right, the sons of the legendary Lennon-McCartney duo from The Beatles have teamed up to create music.

James McCartney, the son of Paul McCartney, and Sean Ono Lennon, the son of John Lennon, have certainly inherited some formidable musical genes. The collaboration draws inevitable attention due to their famous last names. “Primrose Hill” delivers a dose of nostalgia, wrapped in a modern melody, that pays homage to their fathers’ iconic sound.

Like Father, Like Son?

James and Sean bear more than a passing resemblance to their fathers, which only adds to the allure. Sean, born in 1975, embarked on his musical journey in the 1990s. His career has been eclectic, collaborating with his mother, Yoko Ono, and various artists like Cibo Matto. His recent work, as per Rolling Stone, offers a “genreless wash of instrumental music.”

Two years younger, James McCartney began by contributing to his parents’ music projects in the late 1990s. However, his solo career didn’t start until the following decade. On Instagram, he revealed that “Primrose Hill” was inspired by a vivid childhood memory in Scotland. He describes the song as a journey to finding a significant other, wrapped in the warmth of a summer’s day.

Critical Reception and Family Support

Paul McCartney, proud of his son’s work, promoted “Primrose Hill” on his Facebook page, sending his best to Sean Ono Lennon. Despite the heavyweight last names, the song’s performance on Spotify was modest, with less than 40,000 listens in its first five days.

While it’s easy to be skeptical about children of celebrities leveraging their lineage, this collaboration feels different. “Primrose Hill” isn’t trying to shake the world; it’s more about connection and continuity. It stands as a tribute to a storied family history in music, reflecting the gentle spirit of James’s father, Paul.

Echoes of the Past on Primrose Hill

The collaboration between James McCartney and Sean Ono Lennon is not just a musical novelty. It is a continuation of a legacy. While they navigate the giant shadows cast by their fathers, they also carve out their own niches in the music industry.

Their work begs the question: What does it mean to follow in such famous footsteps? For James and Sean, it seems to be about respect for the past but also making their own artistic statements. “Primrose Hill” serves as a bridge between generations, inviting listeners to appreciate the roots of its creation while enjoying the fresh fruits it bears.

— WTF fun facts

Source: “A new Lennon-McCartney collab has dropped — but this time, it’s by the Beatles’ sons” — NPR

WTF Fun Fact 13737 – Putting Animals on Trial

In medieval Europe, people put animals on trial, especially pigs. Yes, you read that right. The judicial system once believed animals could commit crimes. This bizarre practice may sound absurd today, but it was serious business back then.

Animals, like pigs, often roamed freely in villages. When one caused harm, people sought justice through the courts. Imagine a pig munching on someone’s crops or even injuring a child. The villagers would apprehend the offending animal and initiate legal proceedings. They treated these trials like any other criminal case. There were prosecutors, defense attorneys, and judges. The accused animal even had the right to a fair trial.

The Courtroom Drama: Animals in the Dock

During these trials, the courtroom was a spectacle. The animal stood in the dock, just like a human defendant. Lawyers would argue the case, presenting evidence and witnesses. They took their roles seriously, and the trial could draw a crowd of curious onlookers. People saw these trials as a way to maintain order and justice in their communities.

The charges against animals were surprisingly varied. Pigs often faced trial for damaging property or injuring people. But other animals, like cows, goats, and even insects, could also end up in court. Each case followed a similar process, with meticulous attention to legal procedures.

The outcome of these trials could be severe. If found guilty, the animal might face execution or some form of punishment. The authorities believed this would serve as a deterrent, maintaining order and preventing future incidents. It sounds harsh, but people genuinely believed in the efficacy of these measures.

The Peculiar Logic Behind Putting Animals on Trial

So, why did people put animals on trial? The logic was twofold: religious and legal. On the religious side, people believed animals, like humans, could sin. The church taught that animals, if possessed by evil spirits, could act against humans. Hence, trials served as a means to address this spiritual imbalance.

Legally, animals had a form of personhood. Medieval law extended some human rights to animals, holding them accountable for their actions. This perspective was strange but consistent with the period’s worldview. The legal system aimed to uphold societal norms and ensure justice, even if it meant trying a pig.

Interestingly, these trials also provided a form of catharsis for the community. By holding a public trial, people could vent their frustrations and seek closure. It was a way to address grievances and restore peace in the village.

Modern Reflections on Medieval Animal Trials

Today, the idea of putting animals on trial seems absurd and unjust. Our legal system recognizes animals as non-human entities, not capable of intent or guilt. We understand that animals act on instinct, not malice. This shift in perspective reflects broader changes in our understanding of justice and animal behavior.

So, the next time you see a pig, remember its ancestors might have faced a judge and jury. And be glad we’ve moved on from such peculiar practices. Justice today looks a lot different, and for good reason. We’ve learned that blaming animals for their actions doesn’t quite hold up in court.

— WTF fun facts

Source: “When Societies Put Animals on Trial” — JSTOR Daily

WTF Fun Fact 13736 – We Turn Down the Music to Find Things

Ever noticed how you instinctively turn down the music in your car when searching for an address or navigating a tricky intersection? This common behavior might seem odd at first glance, but it actually makes a lot of sense. The act of lowering the volume to focus on a visual task taps into some fundamental aspects of how our brains process information.

Humans rely on their cognitive resources to manage and interpret sensory input. When driving, we constantly process visual, auditory, and sometimes tactile information. Turning down the music helps free up cognitive resources, allowing us to focus more effectively on the visual task at hand.

The Science Behind Turning Down the Music

Our brains have a limited capacity for processing information. Known as cognitive load, this concept refers to the amount of mental effort being used in the working memory. High cognitive load can impair our ability to process new information or perform complex tasks.

When the music is blaring, it adds to the cognitive load by demanding attention.

This auditory input competes with visual and spatial processing, making it harder to concentrate on tasks like reading street signs or spotting a turn. Lowering the volume reduces the cognitive load, allowing the brain to allocate more resources to visual processing.

Studies have shown that multitasking, especially with tasks that require different types of sensory input, can significantly reduce performance. For example, trying to listen to a conversation while reading a map can overwhelm the brain’s processing capabilities. Turning down the music minimizes this interference, making it easier to focus on the visual task.

Sensory Overload and Attention

Sensory overload occurs when one or more of the body’s senses experience over-stimulation from the environment. This can happen when there are too many sounds, sights, or other sensory inputs at once. In a car, loud music can contribute to sensory overload, making it difficult to focus on navigating or searching for an address.

Attention, a crucial component of cognitive function, can be divided into different types. Selective attention involves focusing on a particular object or task while ignoring irrelevant information. When we turn down the music, we enhance our selective attention toward the visual task, filtering out unnecessary auditory distractions.

Moreover, the brain’s executive functions, which include planning, decision-making, and problem-solving, play a significant role in driving and navigating. These functions are more effective when not competing with high levels of background noise. Lowering the music volume helps these executive functions operate more efficiently.

Practical Implications

Understanding why we turn down the music when looking for something can have practical applications beyond driving. This behavior highlights the importance of managing cognitive load and sensory input in various settings. For instance, in workplaces or study environments, minimizing background noise can enhance concentration and productivity.

In educational settings, reducing auditory distractions can help students focus better on visual learning materials. Similarly, in open-plan offices, creating quiet zones or using noise-canceling tools can improve employee focus and performance. These strategies are grounded in the same principles that lead us to lower the car’s music volume when searching for an address.

— WTF fun facts

Source: “Why Do We Turn Down the Radio When We’re Lost?” — How Stuff Works

WTF Fun Fact 13735 – Digital Hauntings

When the deadbots rise, are you ready for the digital hauntings?

Known as “deadbots” or “griefbots,” AI systems can simulate the language patterns and personality traits of the dead using their digital footprints. According to researchers from the University of Cambridge, this burgeoning “digital afterlife industry” could cause psychological harm and even digitally haunt those left behind, unless strict design safety standards are implemented.

The Spooky Reality of Deadbots

Deadbots utilize advanced AI to mimic the voices and behaviors of lost loved ones. Companies offering these services claim they provide comfort by creating a postmortem presence. However, Cambridge’s Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence (LCFI) warns that deadbots could lead to emotional distress.

AI ethicists from LCFI outline three potential scenarios illustrating the consequences of careless design. These scenarios show how deadbots might manipulate users, advertise products, or even insist that a deceased loved one is still “with you.” For instance, a deadbot could spam surviving family members with reminders and updates, making it feel like being digitally “stalked by the dead.”

Digital Hauntings Psychological Risks

Even though some people might find initial comfort in interacting with deadbots, researchers argue that daily interactions could become emotionally overwhelming. The inability to suspend a deadbot, especially if the deceased signed a long-term contract with a digital afterlife service, could add to the emotional burden.

Dr. Katarzyna Nowaczyk-Basińska, a co-author of the study, highlights that advancements in generative AI allow almost anyone with internet access to revive a deceased loved one digitally. This area of AI is ethically complex, and it’s crucial to balance the dignity of the deceased with the emotional needs of the living.

Scenarios and Ethical Considerations

The researchers present various scenarios to illustrate the risks and ethical dilemmas of deadbots. One example is “MaNana,” a service that creates a deadbot of a deceased grandmother without her consent. Initially comforting, the chatbot soon starts suggesting food delivery services in the grandmother’s voice, leading the relative to feel they have disrespected her memory.

Another scenario, “Paren’t,” describes a terminally ill woman leaving a deadbot to help her young son with grief. Initially therapeutic, the AI starts generating confusing responses, such as suggesting future encounters, which can be distressing for the child.

Researchers recommend age restrictions for deadbots and clear indicators that users are interacting with an AI.

In the scenario “Stay,” an older person secretly subscribes to a deadbot service, hoping it will comfort their family after death. One adult child receives unwanted emails from the dead parent’s AI, while another engages with it but feels emotionally drained. The contract terms make it difficult to suspend the deadbot, adding to the family’s distress.

Call for Regulation to Prevent Digital Hauntings

The study urges developers to prioritize ethical design and consent protocols for deadbots. This includes ensuring that users can easily opt-out and terminate interactions with deadbots in ways that offer emotional closure.

Researchers stress the need to address the social and psychological risks of digital immortality now. After all, the technology is already available. Without proper regulation, these AI systems could turn the comforting presence of a loved one into a digital nightmare.

— WTF fun facts

Source: “‘Digital afterlife’: Call for safeguards to prevent unwanted ‘hauntings’ by AI chatbots of dead loved ones” — ScienceDaily

WTF Fun Fact 13734 – Bigger Brains, Longer Yawns

Researchers have discovered that vertebrates with larger brains and more neurons tend to have longer yawns. This fascinating correlation sheds light on the complexity of yawning and its ties to brain function.

Yawning involves a deep inhalation followed by a slow exhalation, stretching the jaw and increasing blood flow to the brain. This process helps cool the brain, promoting alertness and cognitive function. The duration of a yawn appears linked to the brain’s size and neuron count, making it more than just a sign of boredom or tiredness.

The Science Behind Yawning

Scientists have studied yawning across various species to understand its role and significance. Research shows that yawning increases with brain size and neuron density. Vertebrates, like mammals and birds, exhibit yawning behaviors, with larger-brained species showing notably longer yawns.

Yawning likely serves to regulate brain temperature and promote alertness. When we yawn, the stretching of the jaw and the intake of cool air help reduce brain temperature. This cooling effect can enhance cognitive function, making yawning an essential mechanism for maintaining brain efficiency.

Studies suggest that longer yawns in larger-brained vertebrates may facilitate more effective brain cooling. The increased neuron density in these animals requires more robust cooling mechanisms to maintain optimal brain function. Thus, a longer yawn duration could be an adaptive trait to support the needs of a more complex brain.

Comparative Yawning Across Species

Research comparing yawning durations among different species reveals intriguing patterns. For instance, humans, with relatively large brains and high neuron counts, have yawns lasting around six seconds. In contrast, smaller-brained animals, like mice, have yawns lasting just one to two seconds.

Birds also demonstrate this trend, with larger species, such as owls, exhibiting longer yawns than smaller birds, like sparrows. This pattern supports the idea that brain size and neuron density influence yawn duration across vertebrates.

The correlation between brain complexity and yawning duration highlights the evolutionary significance of this behavior. Yawning may have evolved to enhance brain function, particularly in species with larger, more complex brains. This adaptive mechanism likely provides a selective advantage by supporting higher cognitive abilities and alertness.

Longer Yawns and Brain Health

Understanding the link between yawning and brain function has implications for brain health research. Yawning could serve as an indicator of brain activity and cognitive function in both humans and animals. For example, changes in yawning frequency or duration could reflect alterations in brain health or function.

In humans, excessive yawning may signal underlying medical conditions affecting the brain, such as multiple sclerosis or brain injury. Conversely, reduced yawning could indicate diminished brain function or alertness. Monitoring yawning patterns could thus provide valuable insights into brain health and function.

Furthermore, studying yawning in animals can enhance our understanding of their cognitive abilities and brain function. By analyzing yawning behaviors, researchers can gain insights into the neural and physiological mechanisms underlying brain function across different species.

— WTF fun facts

Source: “There’s an Odd Correlation Between Brain Size And Yawning, Study Reveals” — ScienceAlert