interesting fact

WTF Fun Fact 13606 – Rooster Recognition

by

What’s rooster recognition? Well, it turns out that roosters might recognize themselves in mirrors. This finding from the University of Bonn not only sheds light on chicken behavior but also hints at broader implications for animal cognition.

Breaking Down the Experiment of Rooster Recognition

The traditional way of testing self-recognition in animals is through the “Mark Test.” An animal is marked in a spot they can’t see without a mirror. If the animal then inspects the mark in the mirror, it’s taken as evidence of self-recognition. However, this test can be problematic, as not all animals respond to it, potentially due to the artificial nature of the experiment.

Researchers at the University of Bonn, alongside the Ruhr University in Bochum, took a different approach. They focused on a behavior integral to chickens: the alarm call. Roosters often alert their peers to danger, like an approaching predator, through specific calls. Interestingly, when alone, they remain silent to avoid drawing attention to themselves. This natural behavior became the cornerstone of the experiment.

Roosters Responding to Reflection

In a controlled environment, the researchers projected an image of a predator and observed the roosters’ reactions. When in the presence of another rooster, separated by a grid, the birds frequently issued alarm calls. In solitude, these calls are drastically reduced. This showed that roosters typically alert their peers to danger.

The intriguing part came when researchers replaced the grid with a mirror. Facing their reflection and the simulated predator, the roosters rarely sounded the alarm. This suggested they didn’t perceive their reflection as another bird. While some may argue they saw a mimicking stranger in the mirror, the lack of alarm calls pointed to a potential self-recognition.

Understanding Animal Cognition

This study goes beyond just understanding animal cognition; it could influence how we conduct future research in the field. By integrating behavior that’s ecologically relevant to the species in question, researchers may obtain more accurate results. The classic Mark test might not always be the best indicator of self-recognition, as demonstrated by the roosters’ behavior.

The implications of this research extend beyond the barnyard. Understanding animal self-recognition and awareness is crucial for discussions surrounding animal rights and welfare. If animals like roosters possess a level of self-awareness previously unrecognized, it could call for a reevaluation of how we treat them.

—WTF fun facts

Source: “Roosters might recognize themselves in the mirror” — ScienceDaily

WTF Fun Fact 13603 – The Fight Over Taco Tuesday

by

Taco Bell enthusiasts across the U.S. have a reason to cheer: “Taco Tuesday” is now free for everyone to use in all 50 states, thanks to the fast food chain’s relentless legal battle.

Taco Bell’s Battle for the Beloved Term ‘Taco Tuesday’

The ubiquitous phrase might seem like a universal term. Still, until recently, legal restrictions prevented its widespread use. Taco Bell, believing that the phrase was too ingrained in popular culture to be trademarked, took action earlier this year. They sought to challenge two trademark regulations that limited the term’s use. The chain’s legal initiative wasn’t just for their benefit but aimed at ensuring that taco lovers everywhere could use and celebrate the term without hesitation.

Taco John’s, another prominent fast-food chain, had the trademark rights for “Taco Tuesday” in 49 states. But they folded to Taco Bell’s legal pressure, letting go of their trademark. Yet, there was still one last holdout – New Jersey.

New Jersey’s Tuesday Turmoil

The credit for “Taco Tuesday” in the Garden State goes to Gregory’s Restaurant and Bar, situated in Somers Point. They held onto their 1982 trademark for the phrase until this very week. But as they say, all good things come to those who wait.

Taco Bell’s patience paid off when the New Jersey restaurant decided to relinquish its rights, sealing Taco Bell’s victory across the nation. Their triumph allows everyone, from businesses to residents, to embrace the joy of “Taco Tuesday” without legal constraints.

Sean Tresvant, Taco Bell’s Chief Global Brand and Strategy Officer (and soon-to-be CEO), expressed the brand’s enthusiasm in a news release. He emphasized the company’s commitment to making “Taco Tuesday” accessible for everyone, whether they’re making, selling, or simply enjoying tacos.

In light of their legal win, the chain anticipates ushering in a new age for eateries throughout the U.S. The freedom to promote and relish “Taco Tuesday” now extends to all, from big chains like Taco John’s and Taco Bell to local taco joints.

Gregory’s Graceful Concession

But what about the man behind the trademark in New Jersey? Gregory Gregory, co-owner of Gregory’s Restaurant and Bar, held exclusive rights to the phrase for over three decades. However, he recently chose to step back, acknowledging the widespread love for “Taco Tuesday” that extended beyond his establishment.

In his statement, he shared his pride and excitement about the phrase’s history at his restaurant. And while the trademark might be gone, Gregory ensures that the delicious spirit of Tuesdays will remain a forever feature at his eatery.

—WTF fun facts

Source: “The Phrase ‘Taco Tuesday’ Can Now Be Used in All 50 States” — Food Network

WTF Fun Fact 13598 – The Science of Champagne Bubbles

by

Champagne toasts at celebrations are iconic, but have you ever wondered about the perfect straight-line rise of its bubbles? Scientists at Brown University and the University of Toulouse have uncorked the answer, revealing the science behind the behavior of bubbles in our favorite carbonated drinks.

Carbonation’s Mysteries Unveiled

In the world of carbonated drinks, from soda to beer, the bubbles’ behavior varies. But Champagne and sparkling wine stand out. They feature a continuous rise of gas bubbles, rushing to the surface in a single-file line. This phenomenon, called a stable bubble chain, contrasts with beverages like beer, where bubbles often take a more chaotic route upwards.

Researchers were intrigued: What caused Champagne’s bubbles to ascend in such an orderly fashion?

Surfactants: The Science of Champagne Bubbles

Delving deeper, the study unveiled that the straight rise of bubbles in Champagne and sparkling wine is due to the presence of soap-like compounds called surfactants. Surfactants reduce tension between the liquid and gas bubbles, facilitating a seamless and straight rise to the top.

Roberto Zenit, a senior author on the study, explains, “These protein molecules that impart flavor and uniqueness to the Champagne are also responsible for the stability of the bubbles they produce.”

Apart from surfactants, the bubble size too determines its stability. Larger bubbles in drinks cause a smoother ascent, forming stable chains similar to those with surfactants. This revelation establishes surfactants and bubble size as the key determinants in the formation of stable bubble chains in carbonated beverages.

This bubbly research isn’t just for beverage enthusiasts. Understanding the science of bubbles, especially stable bubble chains, has broader applications in fluid mechanics, a field that studies the behavior of fluids.

For instance, technologies employing bubble-induced mixing, like water treatment facilities, could benefit from this newfound knowledge. Furthermore, the study might pave the way for a better comprehension of natural phenomena, such as ocean seeps where methane and carbon dioxide are released from the ocean bed.

Experiments Worth Raising a Glass To

Researchers brought an array of beverages to the table, including Pellegrino sparkling water, Tecate beer, Charles de Cazanove champagne, and a Spanish-style brut. They utilized a plexiglass container with a needle at its base, enabling them to pump gas and create diverse bubble chains.

By systematically adjusting surfactants and bubble size, they found that both these factors independently contributed to transforming unstable bubble chains into stable ones. Additionally, numerical simulations on computers were conducted to delve into intricate details like surfactant quantity in gas bubbles and precise bubble velocities.

Champagne Bubbles in the Future of Fluid Mechanics

While enjoying that next glass of bubbly, one can marvel at the fluid mechanics at play. Researchers are keen on diving deeper into the behavior of bubbles, especially in their application to fluid mechanics. As Zenit summarizes, they aim to explore the movement of bubbles and their significance in both industrial applications and natural scenarios.

—WTF fun facts

Source: “Why do Champagne bubbles rise the way they do? Scientists’ new discovery is worthy of a toast” — ScienceDaily

WTF Fun Fact 13597 – Unique Perception of Soccer Goalkeepers

by

In the dynamic world of soccer, goalkeepers have always been seen as outliers. While they defend their posts, these players face the arduous task of making quick decisions under pressure, often with fragmented information. New research sheds light on the exceptional way goalkeepers perceive their surroundings, revealing significant differences in their multisensory processing capabilities.

Enhanced Multi-Sensory Processing of Soccer Goalkeepers

Michael Quinn from Dublin City University, himself a former professional goalkeeper, embarked on this study to validate a longstanding soccer belief. He, alongside his team, found that, unlike other players, goalkeepers have an intrinsic knack for making swift decisions. This is the case even when faced with limited sensory data. It’s not just a feeling within the soccer community; now, there’s scientific evidence supporting the notion that goalkeepers genuinely “see” the world differently.

In an innovative approach, Quinn and his team examined temporal binding windows among professional goalkeepers, outfield soccer players, and those who don’t play soccer. This window represents the time frame within which individuals combine sensory data from various sources.

A Deep Dive into the Goalkeeper’s Brain

The study had participants discern visual and auditory stimuli that appeared in different sequences and intervals. Interestingly, goalkeepers exhibited a more refined ability to discern these multisensory cues, indicating their superior estimation of timing. This precision stands in stark contrast to outfield players and non-players.

Furthermore, goalkeepers demonstrated less interplay between visual and auditory cues. This suggests they tend to separate sensory information rather than blending them. This unique ability stems from their need to process various cues simultaneously. The trajectory of a ball, combined with the sound it makes when kicked, are essential inputs for a goalkeeper’s split-second decision-making.

Origins and Future Explorations into the Perceptions of Soccer Goalkeepers

While the current findings illuminate the distinct perceptual world of soccer goalkeepers, the cause of these differences remains a mystery. Does intense, specialized training from an early age shape their multisensory processing? Or are inherent abilities leading young players to gravitate toward the goalkeeper position?

David McGovern, the study’s lead investigator, expressed curiosity about other specialized soccer positions. Could strikers or center-backs also exhibit unique perceptual tendencies? The team at Dublin City University aims to unravel these questions in subsequent studies. They will explore the development and influences on a goalkeeper’s extraordinary sensory processing capabilities.

—WTF fun facts

Source:

WTF Fun Fact 13596 – Morality Judgment

by

A new study found that we tend to reserve our harshest morality judgment is reserved those within our social circle.

Morality Judgment within Groups

We often assume that we judge those close to us with a gentler touch. Yet, Cornell University’s latest findings suggest otherwise: we tend to be stricter with our own peers, especially when it comes to moral failings.

Morality, the invisible bond that keeps a community united, often sets the standards for judgment. Simone Tang, a significant contributor to the research, states that our ties within a group make us believe its members are more trustworthy. However, a breach in moral conduct by one of our own can potentially tarnish the entire group’s reputation. As a result, to safeguard the group’s integrity, we might end up being more critical of our own members.

The Dynamics of Ingroup vs. Outgroup

Members of the “ingroup” usually have something in common – be it political beliefs, organizational ties, or even nationality. On the flip side, the “outgroup” represents individuals from different backgrounds, nationalities, or institutions. Despite conventional wisdom suggesting favoritism towards ingroup members, the study points out that moral transgressions by ingroup members often invite stricter judgments.

Engaging 2,361 participants, a mix of university students and members of American online communities, the study unveiled intriguing patterns. Participants learned about inappropriate actions, either by an ingroup or an outgroup member. A clear distinction emerged when comparing reactions to moral violations like gender discrimination with non-moral ones like tardiness. Ingroup members committing moral violations faced tougher criticism, hinting at the value people place on preserving the moral fabric of their community.

Real-world Implications

Shedding light on larger societal issues, Tang highlights the implications of their findings in contemporary politics. The growing polarization might not just be an ‘us versus them’ scenario. Instead, as the research suggests, harsh judgments against opposing views may arise from viewing adversaries as part of the same larger group, say, fellow Americans. This perspective shift offers a fresh lens to understand the rising internal divisions within major societal groups.

—WTF fun facts

Source: “Familiarity breeds contempt for moral failings” — ScienceDaily

WTF Fun Fact 13595 – Gender in Human-Robot Interaction

by

In the world of hospitality, there’s a growing preference when it comes to gender in human-robot interaction.

When guests interact with robots at hotels, they tend to feel more at ease with female robots. This trend is stronger when these robots possess human-like features, reveals a study from Washington State University.

Gender Stereotypes Extend to Robots

Soobin Seo, the mind behind the research and an assistant professor at WSU’s Carson Business College, sheds light on the reasons for this phenomenon. “People generally find solace when cared for by females, a result of prevalent gender stereotypes associated with service roles,” she explains. “This stereotype doesn’t stop at human interactions; it extends to hotel robot interactions too. And when these robots resemble humans closely, the preference is even more evident.”

Before the onset of the global pandemic, the hotel industry grappled with keeping its staff. Some hoteliers found a solution in automation and robots, employing them in various roles. They’re not just tucked away in the back, handling chores like dishwashing or cleaning. Robots today, in some establishments, welcome guests or even handle their luggage.

The upscale Mandarin Oriental Hotel in Las Vegas, for instance, employs female humanized robots named “Pepper.” On the other side of the spectrum, China’s fully automated FlyZoo hotel chain offers an exclusive robot and AI-powered experience to its guests.

Study Highlights Distinct Preferences for Human-Robot Interaction

To delve deeper into this preference, participants in Seo’s study visualized interactions with AI service robots during their hotel stay. Four distinct scenarios were crafted for this experiment:

  1. A male service robot, “Alex,” equipped with a face and a body resembling a human.
  2. “Sara,” a robot identical to Alex but female.
  3. Two other robot descriptions, gendered differently but portrayed as more mechanical with interactive screens replacing faces.

Feedback from participants was quite revealing. Those who imagined interactions with female robots, especially the human-like ones, found their experience more pleasant. In contrast, the male robot scenarios didn’t evoke a similarly positive response.

Future Considerations in AI and Hospitality

But it’s not just about gender preferences. The implications of substituting human hotel staff with AI robots span broader issues. Seo highlights a crucial consideration: “When a robot errs or malfunctions, like misplacing luggage or botching a reservation, guests will likely seek human intervention.”

Moreover, Seo and her team at WSU are currently probing another dimension: the robot’s personality. Do guests prefer robots that are chatty and outgoing, or those that are more reserved?

For AI robot developers and hotel employers, these findings are invaluable. Seo predicts an uptick in robot usage in hotels and restaurants, emphasizing the importance of understanding psychological dynamics in such interactions. “The intricacies we see in human-to-human interactions might very well shape the future of human-to-robot interactions,” she concludes.

— WTF fun facts

Source: “People prefer interacting with female robots in hotels, study finds” — ScienceDaily

WTF Fun Fact 13594 – Benefits of the Snooze Button

by

There are more benefits of the snooze button than just getting an extra few minutes of sleep.

For many, the snooze button been branded as the ultimate “sleep disruptor.” But new findings from Stockholm University’s Department of Psychology may be about to turn this common belief on its head.

Snoozing: A Maligned Habit?

It’s a widely held belief that tapping that tempting snooze button might be doing us more harm than good. Critics claim it disrupts our sleep patterns, making us groggier and less alert when we eventually rise. But, is there any scientific basis to this belief?

The recent study led by Tina Sundelin of Stockholm University is turning this narrative around. Contrary to popular belief, hitting the snooze button might actually support the waking process for those who regularly find solace in those few extra minutes.

A Deep Dive into the Benefits of the Snooze Button

This comprehensive research involved two phases. The initial study surveyed 1,732 individuals on their morning habits. Findings highlighted that a significant number, especially among young adults and night owls, lean heavily on the snooze function. Their main reason? Feeling overwhelmingly fatigued when the first alarm rings.

The second phase delved deeper. Thirty-one habitual snoozers spent two nights in a sleep lab. On one morning, they had the luxury to snooze for an additional 30 minutes, while the other morning demanded an immediate wake-up call. Results revealed that most participants actually enjoyed more than 20 minutes of additional sleep during the snooze time. This had little impact on the overall quality or duration of their night’s rest.

What Does the Snooze Button Really Do?

Here’s the kicker: not only did the snooze function not disrupt the participants’ sleep, it also ensured no one was jolted awake from deep slumber. Moreover, those who indulged in that extra rest displayed slightly sharper cognitive abilities upon waking. Factors such as mood, overall sleepiness, or cortisol levels in the saliva remained unaffected.

Sundelin points out, “Our findings reveal that a half-hour snooze does not negatively impact night sleep or induce sleep inertia, which is that groggy feeling post-wakeup. In some instances, the results were even favorable. For example, we noticed a reduced chance of participants waking from deep sleep stages.”

While these findings might be a relief for serial snoozers, Sundelin adds a word of caution: “The study primarily focused on individuals who habitually hit the snooze button and can effortlessly drift back to sleep post-alarm. Snoozing might not be a one-size-fits-all solution.”

For those who relish those additional moments of rest in the morning, this research brings good news. Snoozing, at least for regular snoozers, doesn’t seem to steal away the quality of our sleep. On the contrary, it may subtly boost our cognitive processes during the waking stage.

So, the next time your alarm sounds and you’re contemplating another round with the snooze button, remember: You might not be losing out at all by grabbing those few extra minutes of shut-eye.

— WTF fun facts

Source: “You don’t lose if you snooze” — ScienceDaily

WTF Fun Fact 13591 – The Grandmother Hypothesis

by

Have you heard of the grandmother hypothesis? Basically, it means grandma was right about washing behind your ears!

When it comes to maintaining skin health, certain regions, like behind the ears and between the toes, often get overlooked. Research by the George Washington University reveals why paying attention to these areas is essential. The skin microbiome, which refers to the collection of microbes residing on our skin, has shown variation in composition across different skin regions, be it dry, moist, or oily.

Exploring the Grandmother Hypothesis

The GW Computational Biology Institute set out to explore the widely accepted but scientifically unproven “Grandmother Hypothesis.” Keith Crandall, Director of the Computational Biology Institute, recalls the age-old advice from grandmothers: always scrub behind the ears, between the toes, and inside the belly button. But why? The belief is that these less frequently washed areas might house different bacterial compositions compared to more regularly scrubbed parts of the body.

To put this to the test, Marcos Pérez-Losada and Keith Crandall designed a unique genomics course, involving 129 graduate and undergraduate students. These students collected data by swabbing areas like behind their ears, between their toes, and their navels. For comparison, samples were also taken from drier regions such as calves and forearms.

Revealing Differences in Microbial Diversity

The results were enlightening. Forearms and calves, often cleaned more diligently during baths, displayed a broader and presumably healthier range of microbes. This is compared to hotspots like behind the ears and between the toes. A balanced skin microbiome is essential for skin health. A dominance of harmful microbes can disrupt this balance, potentially leading to skin conditions such as eczema or acne.

The study’s outcomes suggest that cleaning habits indeed impact the microbial population on the skin, further influencing its health. Thus, the age-old advice from our grandparents holds some truth after all!

Implications of the Grandmother Hypothesis

The research carried out by the GW Computational Biology Institute provides significant insights into the skin microbiome of healthy adults. It serves as a benchmark for future studies. There is still a long way to go in understanding the intricacies of how the microbial community on our skin impacts our overall health or disease state.

The study titled “Spatial diversity of the skin bacteriome” marked an essential milestone in the field. It sheds light on the diverse bacterial communities residing in different parts of our skin. Published in the renowned journal Frontiers in Microbiology on September 19, it is a stepping stone to further research in this rapidly evolving domain.

In conclusion, paying heed to the lesser-focused regions of our skin, as our ancestors advised, might be the key to ensuring a balanced and healthy skin microbiome. So next time you shower, remember to scrub those often-neglected areas!

— WTF fun facts

Source: “Skin behind the ears and between the toes can host a collection of unhealthy microbes” — ScienceDaily

WTF Fun Fact 13590 – Choosing Ignorance

by

When faced with moral decisions, many people are choosing ignorance about the repercussions of their actions. Recent studies explore why individuals might select the path of willful ignorance, and the findings are illuminating.

The Study of Choosing Ignorance

What makes a person deliberately overlook the consequences of their actions? According to the American Psychological Association, 40% of individuals, when given the choice, will opt for ignorance. More intriguingly, they often do so to give themselves leeway to act selfishly.

As lead author Linh Vu, MS, from the University of Amsterdam, describes it: “Everyday scenarios frequently show people choosing ignorance. A classic instance is when customers disregard the ethically questionable origins of products they purchase.” The pressing question that Vu and her colleagues grappled with was the extent and implications of such intentional ignorance.

The findings stem from a meta-analysis of 22 individual studies, encompassing a whopping 6,531 participants. These studies either took place in a research lab setting or online. A majority of these research initiatives followed a design where participants received information about the ramifications of their decisions, while others had the discretion to know or not.

Consider this example: Participants had to select between a $5 reward and a $6 reward. Choosing the former meant an anonymous person (or charity) would receive the same amount. If they opted for the latter, the anonymous entity would get a mere dollar. Some participants could decide whether to know the consequences, while others were informed outright.

A consistent finding across these studies? An astounding 40% actively chose ignorance. Furthermore, those who opted not to be informed were significantly less altruistic. There was a 15.6% greater likelihood of individuals showing generosity when they were cognizant of the results of their decisions.

Benevolence or Self-Image?

The research suggests that this inclination towards choosing ignorance could be linked to one’s desire to project a positive self-image. Willful ignorance permits individuals to retain this self-perception, even if they don’t act altruistically.

Study co-author Shaul Shalvi, a behavioral ethics professor at the University of Amsterdam, further shed light on this phenomenon. Individuals who sought to know the consequences were 7% more inclined to show generosity than those automatically provided with information. It indicates genuinely altruistic folks prefer to be in the know about their actions’ aftermath.

Shalvi points out, “A vast portion of altruistic tendencies we notice stems from societal expectations. While many willingly make ethical choices when informed of the outcomes, their motivation isn’t always altruistic. Societal pressure and the urge to perceive oneself positively play a significant role. Since righteous deeds often come with sacrifices, such as time, effort, or money, choosing ignorance becomes a convenient escape.”

However, one limitation to note: all studies under this meta-analysis were conducted in Western Europe or the US, or on platforms like Amazon Mechanical Turk. This hints at the need for more diverse research settings in the future. After all, understanding this behavior in its entirety requires a broader perspective and could provide clues on countering such deliberate oversight.

—WTF fun facts

Source: “‘I’d rather not know’: Why we choose ignorance” — ScienceDaily