WTF Fun Fact 13626 – Prediction and Perception

In the world of social interactions, whether it’s a handshake or a casual conversation, we heavily rely on perception and observing others. But have you ever wondered what goes on in your brain during these interactions?

Researchers at the Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience have uncovered some fascinating insights into this aspect of human perception, revealing that our interpretation of others’ actions is more influenced by our expectations than we previously thought.

Decoding Brain Processes in Social Interactions and Observations

For a while, researchers have been looking into how our brains process the actions of others. Common understanding was that observing someone else’s action triggers a specific sequence in our brain: first, the visual brain regions light up, followed by the activation of parietal and premotor regions – areas we use to perform similar actions ourselves.

This theory was based on brain activity observations in humans and monkeys during laboratory experiments involving isolated actions.

However, real-life actions are rarely isolated; they often follow a predictable sequence with an end goal, such as making breakfast. This raises the question: how does our brain handle such sequences?

Our Expectations Shape Our Perception

The new research, led by Christian Keysers and Valeria Gazzola, offers an intriguing perspective. When we observe actions in meaningful sequences, our brains increasingly rely on predictions from our motor system, almost ignoring the visual input.

Simply put, what we anticipate becomes what our brain perceives.

This shift in understanding came from a unique study involving epilepsy patients who participated in intracranial EEG research. This method allowed researchers to measure the brain’s electrical activity directly, offering a rare peek into the brain’s functioning.

Experimenting with Perception

During the study, participants watched videos of everyday actions, like preparing breakfast. The researchers tested two conditions: one where actions were shown in their natural sequence and another where the sequence was randomized. Surprisingly, the brain’s response varied significantly between these conditions.

In the randomized sequence, the brain followed the traditional information flow: from visual to motor regions. But in the natural sequence, the flow reversed. Information traveled from motor regions to visual areas, suggesting that participants relied more on their knowledge and expectations of the task rather than the visual input.

This discovery aligns with the broader realization in neuroscience that our brain is predictive. It constantly forecasts what will happen next, suppressing expected sensory input.

We perceive the world from the inside out, based on our expectations. However, if reality defies these expectations, the brain adjusts, and we become more aware of the actual visual input.

Implications of the Study

Understanding this predictive nature of our brain has significant implications. It sheds light on how we interact socially and could inform approaches in various fields, from psychology to virtual reality technologies.

This research also highlights the complexity of human perception, revealing that our interpretation of the world around us is a blend of sensory input and internal predictions.

The Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience’s study opens new doors in understanding human perception. It challenges the traditional view of sensory processing, emphasizing the role of our expectations in shaping our interpretation of others’ actions. As we continue to explore the depths of the human brain, studies like these remind us of the intricate and fascinating ways in which our mind works.

 WTF fun facts

Source: “When we see what others do, our brain sees not what we see, but what we expect” — ScienceDaily

WTF Fun Fact 13597 – Unique Perception of Soccer Goalkeepers

In the dynamic world of soccer, goalkeepers have always been seen as outliers. While they defend their posts, these players face the arduous task of making quick decisions under pressure, often with fragmented information. New research sheds light on the exceptional way goalkeepers perceive their surroundings, revealing significant differences in their multisensory processing capabilities.

Enhanced Multi-Sensory Processing of Soccer Goalkeepers

Michael Quinn from Dublin City University, himself a former professional goalkeeper, embarked on this study to validate a longstanding soccer belief. He, alongside his team, found that, unlike other players, goalkeepers have an intrinsic knack for making swift decisions. This is the case even when faced with limited sensory data. It’s not just a feeling within the soccer community; now, there’s scientific evidence supporting the notion that goalkeepers genuinely “see” the world differently.

In an innovative approach, Quinn and his team examined temporal binding windows among professional goalkeepers, outfield soccer players, and those who don’t play soccer. This window represents the time frame within which individuals combine sensory data from various sources.

A Deep Dive into the Goalkeeper’s Brain

The study had participants discern visual and auditory stimuli that appeared in different sequences and intervals. Interestingly, goalkeepers exhibited a more refined ability to discern these multisensory cues, indicating their superior estimation of timing. This precision stands in stark contrast to outfield players and non-players.

Furthermore, goalkeepers demonstrated less interplay between visual and auditory cues. This suggests they tend to separate sensory information rather than blending them. This unique ability stems from their need to process various cues simultaneously. The trajectory of a ball, combined with the sound it makes when kicked, are essential inputs for a goalkeeper’s split-second decision-making.

Origins and Future Explorations into the Perceptions of Soccer Goalkeepers

While the current findings illuminate the distinct perceptual world of soccer goalkeepers, the cause of these differences remains a mystery. Does intense, specialized training from an early age shape their multisensory processing? Or are inherent abilities leading young players to gravitate toward the goalkeeper position?

David McGovern, the study’s lead investigator, expressed curiosity about other specialized soccer positions. Could strikers or center-backs also exhibit unique perceptual tendencies? The team at Dublin City University aims to unravel these questions in subsequent studies. They will explore the development and influences on a goalkeeper’s extraordinary sensory processing capabilities.

 WTF fun facts

Source:

WTF Fun Fact 13559 – Fun Fact About Football Jersey Numbers

Did you know that some players pick their football jersey numbers based on how slim the number itself might make them look?!

Numbers on a football jersey are more than just identifiers; they may influence our perception of a player’s physique. Recent research from UCLA delves into this intriguing aspect, suggesting that lower jersey numbers might make players appear slimmer.

The Tradition of Football Jersey Numbers

Traditionally, NFL mandated wide receivers to wear numbers between 80 and 89. However, a policy shift in 2004 offered players more flexibility in their choices. Fast forward to 2019, and a significant 80% of wide receivers favored numbers between 10 and 19. Why such a strong shift?

Ladan Shams, a celebrated professor at UCLA in psychology and neuroscience, spearheaded a study to understand this perceptual phenomenon. Published in the PLOS ONE journal, the research comprised two experiments. Observers consistently perceived players donning jerseys numbered 10-19 as slimmer than those in jerseys numbered 80-89, even when the players’ body sizes were identical.

Shams explained, “Numbers written on objects in our daily lives usually represent their magnitude. The higher the number, the bigger the object. Our brains detect and store these statistical associations, which can shape future perception.”

Addressing Skepticism

Considering potential criticisms, the research team conducted a second experiment. There might be a perception that the numeral 8, being wider than 1, could make players appear broader. To counteract this, they used number pairs like 17 and 71, 18 and 81, 19 and 91. The results? Players with higher numbers still appeared huskier, though the effect was slightly muted.

While these perceptions may not directly affect a player’s on-field performance, such biases have wider implications. These biases, often unnoticeable, influence judgments and decisions in everyday life. For instance, implicit biases, rooted in frequently associated negative qualities with a group, can dictate how individuals within that group are treated.

Shams emphasizes the power of representation, “We need to see all kinds of people doing a diverse range of activities. Harnessing the statistical learning ability of our brains can help counteract implicit bias.”

Football, often seen as just a sport, provides a mirror to deeper societal perceptions and biases. While the choice of a jersey number might seem trivial, it offers profound insights into human psychology and perception. As the saying goes, sometimes the details tell the broader story.

 WTF fun facts

Source: “Lower jersey numbers make football players look thinner” — Science Daily